ArticlePloS one2024
The relative importance of herbicide use for conservation tillage adoption by U.S. corn and soybean producers.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herbicide use is widespread in agricultural production to control weeds prior to and after planting and to "burndown" weeds in the spring for conservation tillage. Whether conservation tillage adoption leads to higher herbicide usage has been a question of policy relevance for decades in the United States. Older U.S. studies using standard statistical and economic techniques have not consistently demonstrated higher herbicide usage levels among producers practicing conservation tillage, but these studies did not fully account for other practices, economic, or agronomic factors. To provide a more timely and comprehensive understanding of the importance of herbicides to conservation tillage, this study achieves two objectives with the most recent, nationally representative data from the US Department of Agriculture. First, it describes trends and compares conservation tillage and herbicide usage among field corn and soybean producers, similar to previous studies using standard economic techniques. Second, a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model is employed-a novel methodology relative to previous studies that offers distinct advantages over traditional regression modeling-to evaluate the importance of herbicide use for conservation tillage adoption while accounting for other factors. Pairwise mean comparisons for field corn and soybeans indicated that herbicide usage pre-emergence was significantly higher with conservation tillage, but there was no consistent, significant differences in herbicide usage post-emergence. The CART analysis (with prediction accuracy ranging from 68-72%) also showed that pre-emergent use of glyphosate was the strongest predictor (with predicted probabilities from 0.83-0.86) of conservation tillage for field corn in 2016 and soybeans in 2018. Other factors such as the use of crop rotations, highly erodible land, region, and farm size were also strong predictors of conservation tillage. These findings highlight the importance and complexity of herbicide use in the adoption of conservation tillage for U.S. field corn and soybeans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.