ArticlePloS one2024
PrEP your step: Implementing an online crowdsourcing contest to engage young people in HIV prevention in Washington DC, USA.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A primary health care Re-Engineering approach to enhance PrEP initiation and adherence among high-risk, sexually active adolescents and young adults in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Crowdsourcing is Acceptable to Develop Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Promotions in Alabama: A Qualitative Study with Sexual Minority Men and Sexual Health Providers.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV incidence among young people (Black and Latinx women and men who have sex with men ages 16-24 years), in the United States is high. Traditional top-down approaches for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) social marketing are not effectively reaching this population. Crowdsourcing is a promising approach to engaging young people in the development of innovative solutions to raise awareness and use of PrEP among those at highest risk of HIV. This study engaged young people in the design and evaluation of an online crowdsourcing contest to promote PrEP among Washington, DC youth. The contest used standard methods recommended by the World Health Organization and feedback from our community partners. Online recruitment using social media elicited online votes and survey responses. We analyzed cross-sectional surveys using descriptive statistics, and semi-structured interviews with contest participants using thematic coding to explore barriers and facilitators to contest engagement. Approximately 82% of entries were from young people in DC. A convenience sample of 181 people voted on their favorite crowdsourced PrEP messages and shared their awareness and attitudes about PrEP. The contest website received 2,500 unique visitors and 4,600 page views. Themes from semi-structured interviews (n = 16) included the need for more community engagement in developing PrEP messaging and positive attitudes towards crowdsourcing. Survey data (n = 887) showed that the crowdsourced messages were well-liked and resonated with the community. Most preferred to see PrEP messages in social media (23%), email (17%) and videos (14%). Approximately 70% of survey participants reported that after viewing the crowdsourced message they would talk to their sexual partner or medical provider (63%) about PrEP, use PrEP (58%), and learn more about PrEP (56%). Crowdsourced messages solicit substantial online viewership. More implementation research is needed to understand the public health impact of integrating social media, crowdsourcing, and community engagement to develop PrEP promotional messages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.