Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39556526›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparison of anti-HCV combined with HCVcAg (Elecsys HCV Duo immunoassay) and anti-HCV rapid test followed by HCV RNA analysis using qRT-PCR to identify active infection for treatment.

Sitthichai Kanokudom, Kittiyod Poovorawan, Pornjarim Nilyanimit, Nungruthai Suntronwong, Ratchadawan Aeemjinda, Sittisak Honsawek, Yong Poovorawan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sitthichai KanokudomCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9482-6353
Kittiyod PoovorawanDepartment of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pornjarim NilyanimitCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nungruthai SuntronwongCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ratchadawan AeemjindaCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sittisak HonsawekCenter of Excellence in Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeleton, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-6807

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can cause acute and chronic hepatitis, leading to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The World Health Organization aims to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030 through extensive screening and treatment. To achieve this goal, comprehensive and widespread screening is essential for diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Elecsys® HCV Duo immunoassay (Duo-assay), which simultaneously detects anti-HCV antibodies (Duo/anti-HCV) and HCV core antigen (Duo/HCVcAg) in a single sample, compared with initially antibody testing followed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Additionally, this study aimed to evaluate a relationship between Duo/HCVcAg and qRT-PCR assay in different genotypes. A total of 769 plasma samples were tested using the Duo-assay to further evaluate the test's performance and conduct Duo/HCVcAg correlation analysis using qRT-PCR for each genotype. Among the active infection group (anti-HCV+/RNA+; n = 473), the Duo-assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting Duo/anti-HCV and 70.6% for Duo/HCVcAg. In the resolved infection group (anti-HCV+/RNA-; n = 176), the assay showed 100% sensitivity for Duo/anti-HCV and 100% specificity for Duo/HCVcAg. In the non-infected group (anti-HCV-/RNA-; n = 120), the assay showed 100% specificity for both Duo/anti-HCV and Duo/HCVcAg. Moreover, no correlation was observed between the Duo/HCVcAg and HCV RNA tests, irrespective of genotype. These findings indicate that the Duo-assay is highly sensitive for detecting anti-HCV and specifically identifies patients with active infection. Nevertheless, cases with anti-HCV+/HCVcAg-results should undergo additional confirmation with western blot/immunoblot and qRT-PCR to ensure diagnostic accuracy, especially in Blood donation facilities.

Indexed as

HepacivirusHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificityAdultFemaleGenotypeHepatitis C AntigensHumansImmunoassayMaleMiddle AgedHepatitis C AntibodiesHepatitis C AntigensRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID39556526
PMCPMC11573151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.