Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39556409›Full record

ReviewRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2025

Diagnostic and prognostic value of time to positivity in blood cultures. An opinion paper.

P Maffezzoli, M Kestler, A Burillo, S Corcione, F G De Rosa, P Muñoz, E Bouza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative evaluation of BacT/ALERT PF Plus and PF pediatric blood culture bottles: A dual in vitro and clinical retrospective study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P Maffezzoli
M KestlerMartha Kestler, Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. martha.kestler@salud.madrid.org.
A Burillo
S Corcione
F G De Rosa
P Muñoz
E Bouza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time to positivity (TTP) refers to the duration required for a microbiological culture test to indicate a positive result, marking the onset of detectable bacterial or fungal growth in the sample. Numerous variables, including patient characteristics, infection source, former antimicrobial therapy, blood sample volume, and sample transportation time can influence the value of TTP. Several studies have been conducted on bloodstream infections, whereas studies on the clinical significance of yeast TTP are quite limited in the literature. Furthermore, many studies are retrospective and have a small sample size. In this opinion paper, we have formulated some questions and attempted to provide answers based on the available literature and our perspective. The objective of this opinion paper is to summarise current knowledge based on the literature, aiming to offer a critical perspective, particularly on aspects with weaker evidence, which could guide future studies in this area. We believe that TTP of blood cultures appears to exhibit considerable potential and may prove to be a valuable tool in clinical practice for estimating patient mortality risk and guiding antimicrobial therapy choices. Topics discussed include the diagnostic and prognostic role of TTP in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteremias and in candidemias, and the significance of differential time to positivity (DTTP). In summary, our opinion is that, based on the available literature, it is not possible to determine whether TTP provides prognostic information, particularly concerning candidemia. Therefore, clinical decisions cannot be systematically based on this parameter.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBlood CultureCandidemiaFungemiaHumansPrognosisTime Factorsbacteremiablood culturescandidemiacatheter-related infectionsdiagnosismicrobiologyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID39556409
PMCPMC11758879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.