SynthesisBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Pooled prevalence of Escherichia coli phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Pathogenome and Plasmid-Borne Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes in a Multidrug-Resistant O111:H8 Shiga Toxin-ProducingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Identification, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacterial Pathogens in Farm Animals from Western Kazakhstan.Biology · 2026Article
- Effect of supplementing aBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escherichia coli is a zoonotic bacterium, and its resistance to antimicrobials has become an increasing problem in global health. This study aimed to determine the phenotypic and genotypic pooled prevalence of E. coli with antimicrobial resistance profiles in poultry through systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles available in scientific databases from years 2017 to 2024 were evaluated. Overall, 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis and prevalence of E. coli resistance in poultry. Estimated by the random effects model, the pooled prevalence of resistance to at least one antibiotic in E. coli isolated from poultry samples was 76.96% (95% CI = 48.74-92.15%), and multidrug-resistant isolates of 89.44% (95% CI = 75.51-95.88%). The highest prevalence was to nalidixic acid (86.67%; 95% CI = 59.32-96.67%), followed by isolates resistant to tetracycline (79.33%; 95% CI = 62.86-89.69%). Tetracycline resistance genes had the highest prevalence, with 29.78% of isolates (498/1076) positive for at least one of the three genes (tetA, tetB and/or tetC). The levels of phenotypic and genotypic prevalence of E. coli in poultry can provide a scientific basis for the control of antibiotic-resistant strains and contribute to the competent authorities to guide the management interventions that best suit the different geographical regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.