ArticleHealth economics review2024
Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment.
Article in Health economics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesValue-based insurance design (VBID) aims to direct consumers' preferences by incentivizing the use of high-value care and discouraging the use of low-value care. However, consumers often have limited knowledge of health insurance and the health insurance system, possibly distorting their preferences. In this study, we aim to investigate the impact of specific information treatments on consumers' preferences for VBID.
methodsWe implemented an information experiment as part of a representative survey on health insurance literacy and preferences for VBID within Switzerland's choice-based health insurance system. Preferences for VBID were measured through a discrete choice experiment. Cross-sectional data on 6,033 respondents aged 26-75 were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed logit regressions.
resultsRespondents showed strong preferences for their current health insurance instead of VBID alternatives. A general description of current regulations on cost-sharing, drug disbursement, and monthly premiums significantly increased preferences for VBID (p < 0.01). Pointing respondents specifically to VBID further reduced the opposition against VBID plans. At the same time, there is evidence for anchoring effects in copayments after receiving the information treatments, irrespective of the value of the care.
conclusionsThe results of this study highlight that individuals are susceptible to provided information about health insurance when building their preferences for VBID. One potential explanation is limited health insurance literacy, implying that tailored communication strategies may be needed to improve insurance decision-making. JEL CLASSIFICATION: I11, I13.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.