ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2025
Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation with a 3D robot-assisted image-guided navigation system : Technical solutions.
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How Can Technology Improve Acetabular and Pelvic Fractures Management in the Operating Room? A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Percutaneous fixation of posterior pelvic ring lesions in the elderly: current evidence and recent advances.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Review
- Evaluation of preoperative screw planning and X-ray simulation for iliosacral and transsacral screw placement.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePresentation and description of percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation with the use of a 3D robot-assisted image-guided navigation system and the clinical outcome of this technique. INDICATIONS: Pelvic fractures involving the posterior pelvis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Patients not suited for surgery. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Planning the screws on the diagnostic computer tomogram (CT). Matching with a low-dose CT in the operating room. Lateral incision. Verify the guidewire position with the personalized inlet and outlet views. After correct positioning, place a cannulated screw over the guidewire. For fragility fractures, augmentation is recommended. Finish the surgery with a final 3D scan to confirm correct placement of the screws and cement. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Direct postoperative mobilization with pain-adapted full weight-bearing.
resultsData of 141 patients between January 2018 and August 2022 were analyzed (average age 82 ± 10 years, 89% female). Most of the fractures were type II fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP; 75%). The median hospital stay was 12 ± 7 days and the median surgery duration for a unilateral SI screw was 26 min. In total 221 S1 screws and 17 S2 screws were applied. No screws showed signs of loosening or migration. Of the five suboptimally placed screws, one screw was removed due to sensory impairment. All patients with cement leakage remained without symptoms.
conclusionThe surgical technique with the use of a 3D robot-assisted image-guided navigation system is a technique for safe fixation of dorsal fragility fractures of the pelvis and is associated with fewer complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.