Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39556172›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2024

Percutaneous cryoablation in soft tissue tumor management: an educational review.

Sylvain Bodard, Ruben Geevarghese, Leo Razakamanantsoa, Julien Frandon, Elena N Petre, Clement Marcelin, François H Cornelis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sylvain BodardDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. sylvain.bodard@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-3361
Ruben GeevargheseDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Leo RazakamanantsoaDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Oncology, Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
Julien FrandonRadiology Department, Nimes University Hospital, Nimes, France.
Elena N PetreDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Clement MarcelinDepartment of Radiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
François H CornelisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. cornelif@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1058-0884

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPercutaneous cryoablation (PCA), having shown effectiveness in treating liver, lung, prostate, breast, and kidney tumors, is now gaining attention for the treatment of soft tissue tumors. PCA functions by freezing tissue, which induces ice crystal formation and cell death without damaging collagen structures. Technical considerations include the selection and handling of cryoprobes and cryogenic agents, procedural duration, and choice of image guidance for precision. This review aims to synthesize the mechanisms, applications, and technical aspects of PCA in the treatment of soft tissue tumors.

methodsAdhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a review was conducted of studies published prior to March 2024 that investigated PCA of soft tissue tumors. The review focused on technical and procedural aspects of cryoablation, cryobiological principles, cellular and tissue responses to extreme cold, intra- and post-procedure physiological mechanisms during and post-procedure, and main clinical applications.

resultsPCA is efficient in treating soft tissue tumors, including desmoid tumors, vascular malformations, and abdominal wall endometriosis. Several cryobiological mechanisms are involved, notably ice crystal formation, cellular dehydration, osmotic effects, and the inflammatory response, all of which contribute to its efficacy. Key technical aspects include the choice of cryoprobes, cryogenic agents (argon gas or liquid nitrogen), and the duration and control of freezing/thawing cycles. PCA also frequently outperformed traditional treatments like surgery and radiotherapy in terms of pain reduction, tumor size reduction, and patient outcomes. Moreover, its nerve sideration properties make it effective under local anesthesia.

conclusionDemonstrating substantial pain reduction, tumor size decrease, and high technical success rates, PCA offers a promising and minimally invasive alternative for soft tissue tumor treatment. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Percutaneous cryoablation provides a minimally invasive, precise alternative for soft tissue tumor management, advancing clinical radiology by offering effective treatment with reduced patient risk and enhanced outcomes through image-guided procedures. KEY POINTS: Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative for managing soft tissue tumors. PCA employs image-guided techniques to accurately target and treat tumors, ensuring high precision and control. PCA preserves structures like collagen, reduces pain, decreases tumor size, and generally enhances patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Ablation techniquesCryoablationEducational reviewSoft tissue tumor

Identifiers

PMID39556172
PMCPMC11573955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.