SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in children in community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Feasibility of a Noncontact Photoplethysmography-Based Mobile App for Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring: Exploratory Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA number of clinical studies have been conducted comparing the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive and invasive point-of-care diagnostic tests for anemia, using reference standards such as hematology autoanalyzers.
methodsThis meta-analysis was performed to determine the pooled estimate for the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for the detection of anemia in community settings in children aged up to 14 years and determining whether the diagnostic accuracy of various point-of-care devices differs significantly. We included only original clinical studies with a sample size of 25 or more in the review. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies.
resultsA total of 16 studies (HemoCue in 11; WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale in 3; Masimo, AnemoCheck-LRS, and Sahli's hemoglobinometer in 1 study each) were included. The pooled estimates for the sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care tests were 79.5% (95% CI: 65.6-88.7%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 82.5-94.6%), respectively. The difference in the level of hemoglobin measured was also insignificant between point-of-care and reference standards (MD: 0.2 [95% CI: - 0.2 to 0.6], p = 0.33), as well as for HemoCue and WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale subgroups (p = 0.73 and 0.05, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of HemoCue and WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale were 79% (95% CI: 78-80%)/93% (95% CI: 92-94%) and 89% (95% CI: 86-91%)/88% (95% CI: 74-95%), respectively.
conclusionsPoint-of-care diagnostic tests for anemia have acceptable sensitivity and specificity for screening anemia in children. There was no significant difference between the performance of HemoCue and the WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale. Prospero registration number: CRD42023386952 What is known? • Anemia is a major health prob lem in children in many countries across the world. • Screening for anemia in the community is important for timely therapeutic intervention. • Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for anemia in children allow for quick Hb assessments at the site of care, providing immediate results. • Both non-invasive and micro-invasive POCT devices for anemia are currently available. What is new? • Point-of-care diagnostic tests for anemia have acceptable sensitivity and specificity for screening anemia in children. • There is no significant difference between the performance of HemoCue and the WHO Hemoglobin Color Scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39556152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.