ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2024
Polyinosinic/Polycytidylic Lipid Nanoparticles Enhance Immune Cell Infiltration and Improve Survival in the Glioblastoma Mouse Model.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering nanoparticle surface chemistry for antigen-presenting cell targeting improves specificity and safety of TLR3 agonist cancer immunotherapy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advancements in Drug Delivery Systems in Glioblastoma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Current Status and Evolution of Immunotherapy in Glioma Management.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Triplet RNA Lipid Nanoparticles for Locoregional Cancer Immunotherapy.Small science · 2026Article
- New experimental therapies for glioblastoma: a review of preclinical research.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Review
- Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Current Advances in Nanocarriers for Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) immunotherapy is particularly challenging due to the pro-tumorigenic microenvironment, marked by low levels and inactive immune cells. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists have emerged as potent immune adjuvants but failed to show improved outcomes in clinical trials when administered as a monotherapy. We hypothesize that a combined nanoparticulate formulation of TLR agonist and immunogenic cell death-inducing drug (doxorubicin) will synergize to induce improved GBM immunotherapy. Lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations of the TLR agonists CpG and polyinosinic/polycytidylic (pIpC), with and without Dox, were first prepared, achieving an encapsulation efficiency >75% and a size <140 nm. In vitro studies identified that LNP pIpC was superior to CpG at activating bone marrow-derived immune cell populations (dendritic cells and macrophages) with minimal toxicity. It was also observed that the pIpC formulation can skew macrophage polarization toward the antitumorigenic M1 phenotype and increase macrophage phagocytosis of cancer cells. Upon intratumoral administration, pIpC Dox LNPs led to significant immune cell infiltration and activation. In survival models, the inclusion of Dox into pIpC LNP improved mice survival compared to control. However, addition of Dox did not show significant improvement in mice's survival compared to singly formulated pIpC LNP. This study has illustrated the potential of pIpC LNP formulations in prospective GBM immunotherapeutic regimes. Future studies will focus on optimizing dosage regimen and/or combination with other modalities, including the standard of care (temozolomide), immune checkpoint blockade, or cancer vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.