ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2024
Advancing Non-Atom-Centered Basis Methods for More Accurate Interaction Energies: Benchmarks and Large-Scale Applications.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overview of Developments in the MRCC Program System.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in local electron correlation approaches have enabled the relatively routine access to CCSD(T) [that is, coupled cluster (CC) with single, double, and perturbative triple excitations] computations for molecules of a hundred or more atoms. Here, approaching their complete basis set (CBS) limit becomes more challenging due to extensive basis set superposition errors, often necessitating the use of large atomic orbital (AO) basis sets with diffuse functions. Here, we study a potential remedy in the form of non-atom-centered or floating orbitals (FOs). FOs are still rarely employed even for small molecules due to the practical complication of defining their position, number, exponents, etc. The most frequently used FO method thus simply places a single FO center with a large number of FOs toward the middle of noncovalent dimers; however, a single FO center for larger complexes can soon become insufficient. A recent alternative uses a grid of FO centers around the monomers with a single s function per center, which is currently applicable only for H, C, N, and O atoms. Here, we build on the above advantages and mitigate some drawbacks of previous FO approaches by using a layer of FO centers and 4-9 FOs/center for each monomer. Thus, a double layer of FOs is placed between the interacting subsystems. When extending the double-ζ AO basis with this double layer of FOs, the quality of conventional augmented double-ζ or conventional triple-ζ AO bases can be reached or surpassed with less orbitals, leading to few tenths of a kcal/mol basis set errors for medium-sized dimers. This good performance extends to larger molecules (shown here up to 72 atoms), as efficient local natural orbital (LNO) CCSD(T) computations with only double-ζ AO and 4 FOs/center FO bases match our LNO-CCSD(T)/CBS reference within ca. 0.1 kcal/mol. These developments introduce FO methods to the accurate modeling of large molecular complexes without limitations to atom types by further accelerating efficient correlation calculations, like LNO-CCSD(T).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.