Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555926›Full record

ArticleFlorence Nightingale journal of nursing2024

Breastfeeding After Breast Augmentation Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Figen Kazankaya, Selin Ahsun Paker, Özlem Demirel Bozkurt

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Florence Nightingale journal of nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Figen KazankayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Ege University Faculty of Nursing, İzmir, Turkey.
Selin Ahsun PakerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Ege University Faculty of Nursing, İzmir, Turkey.
Özlem Demirel BozkurtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Ege University Faculty of Nursing, İzmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive overview of research in the literature on breastfeeding experiences of mothers undergoing breast augmentation surgery and the factors influencing this, and to identify gaps in the literature that could inform future design and evaluation. The study was conducted as a comprehensive review based on the approach of Arksey and O'Malley. After scans of relevant databases, such as Scholar, Information Sciences Institute, Science Direct, Ovid, PubMed, and Scientific Information Database, all data were collected, summarized, and given a narrative explanation. In the literature, the correlation between topics involving women's health and aesthetic breast surgery could not be clearly shown. When certain illnesses appeared, aesthetic surgery was blamed, and women who had undergone breast augmentation surgery were undecided about breastfeeding when they became mothers. It was determined in this study that the effects on breastfeeding success in women who have undergone breast augmentation surgery fall principally under three headings: surgery type, placement of implant material, and surgery complications. It is crucial to provide detailed information about the possible consequences of this surgery to women of reproductive age considering this surgery.

Identifiers

PMID39555926
PMCPMC11059175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.