ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2024
Studying Structural Details in Complex Samples. I. Combining two Chromatographic Separation Methods with Ultrahigh Resolution Mass Spectrometry.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Studying Structural Details in Complex Samples: II. High Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS) Coupled to High Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS).Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of complex mixtures poses a challenge due to the high number of compounds present in a mixture, which often exceed the capabilities of analytical methods and instruments. Even more challenging is understanding the structural details of compounds within a complex sample. Most analytical methods provide just bulk information on complex samples, and individual structural details cannot be observed. High-resolution mass spectrometry, the best method to analyze complex samples, suffers from inherent problems for structural studies in complex systems because collision-induced fragmentation (CID) measurements cannot provide data from individual compounds alone. The combination of different steps of chromatographic separation, here the combination of size exclusion chromatography with argentation chromatography, provides sufficient reduction in complexity to implement a method that allows gaining structural details of individual compounds within a complex mixture. The combination of offline size exclusion chromatography followed by online argentation chromatography effectively creates fractions based on the respective properties of the compounds in the mixture (size and number of π-bonds and heteroatoms) and reduces matrix effects to a great extent. Mass spectrometry with ultrahigh resolution provides basic chemical information for each detected compound and also provides the opportunity to gain structural information from MS/MS experiments. The results indicate effectively separated sample fractions yielded by the chromatographic steps with tremendously decreased total numbers of compounds. Especially, argentation chromatography proved to be a valuable separation tool when it comes to heteroatom-containing constituents. In the end, the fragmentation experiments indicated high-quality data due to the clean ion isolation enabled by prior separation. The structural elucidations provided deep insights into the carbon space of crude oil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.