ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Predictive model for aminoglycoside induced ototoxicity.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tobramycin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets in people with cystic fibrosis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Review
- Cancer therapy-induced ototoxicity: Current challenges and emerging management strategies.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Analysis of deafness gene screening results in 15771 newborn cases in Anyang city of Henan.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Irreversible hearing loss is a well-known adverse effect of aminoglycosides, however, inability to accurately predict ototoxicity is a major limitation in clinical care. We addressed this limitation by developing a prediction model for aminoglycoside ototoxicity applicable to the general population. Methods: We employed a prospective non-drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), non-HIV/AIDS cohort of 153 adults on Streptomycin based anti-TB therapy. High frequency pure-tone audiometry was done at regular intervals throughout the study. Clinical and audiological predictors of ototoxicity were collated and ototoxic threshold shift from the baseline audiogram computed. The prediction model was developed with logistic regression method by examining multiple predictors of ototoxicity. Series of models were fitted sequentially; the best model was identified using Akaike Information Criterion and likelihood ratio test. Key variables in the final model were used to develop a logit model for ototoxicity prediction. Results: Ototoxicity occurred in 35% of participants. Age, gender, weight, cumulative Streptomycin dosage, social class, baseline pure tone average (PTA) and prior hearing symptoms were explored as predictors. Multiple logistic regression showed that models with age, cumulative dosage and baseline PTA were best for predicting ototoxicity. Regression parameters for ototoxicity prediction showed that yearly age increment raised ototoxicity risk by 5% (AOR = 1.05; CI, 1.01-1.09), and a gram increase in cumulative dosage increased ototoxicity risk by 7% (AOR = 1.05; CI, 1.05-1.12) while a unit change in baseline log (PTA) was associated 254% higher risk of ototoxicity (AOR = 3.54, CI: 1.25, 10.01). Training and validation models had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as 0.84 (CI, 0.76-0.92) and 0.79 (CI, 0.62-0.96) respectively, showing the model has discriminatory ability. Conclusion: This model can predict aminoglycoside ototoxicity in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.