ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Easy-MODA: Simplifying standardised registration of scientific simulation workflows through MODA template guidelines powered by the Enalos Cloud Platform.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safe and sustainable by design with ML/AI: A transformative approach to advancing nanotechnology.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Revisiting the approaches to DNA damage detection in genetic toxicology: insights and regulatory implications.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Article
- INSIGHT: An integrated framework for safe and sustainable chemical and material assessment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- CompSafeNano project: NanoInformatics approaches for safe-by-design nanomaterials.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- SbD4Skin by EosCloud: Integrating multi-view molecular representation for predicting skin sensitization, irritation, and acute dermal toxicity.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- The round-robin approach applied to nanoinformatics: consensus prediction of nanomaterials zeta potential.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modelling Data (MODA) reporting guidelines have been proposed for common terminology and for recording metadata for physics-based materials modelling and simulations in a CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA 17284:2018). Their purpose is similar to that of the Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) model report form (QMRF) that aims to increase industry and regulatory confidence in QSAR models, but for a wider range of model types. Recently, the WorldFAIR project's nanomaterials case study suggested that both QMRF and MODA templates are an important means to enhance compliance of nanoinformatics models, and their underpinning datasets, with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). Despite the advances in computational modelling of materials properties and phenomena, regulatory uptake of predictive models has been slow. This is, in part, due to concerns about lack of validation of complex models and lack of documentation of scientific simulations. The models are often complex, output can be hardware- and software-dependent, and there is a lack of shared standards. Despite advocating for standardised and transparent documentation of simulation protocols through its templates, the MODA guidelines are rarely used in practice by modellers because of a lack of tools for automating their creation, sharing, and storage. They also suffer from a paucity of user guidance on their use to document different types of models and systems. Such tools exist for the more well-established QMRF and have aided widespread implementation of QMRFs. To address this gap, a simplified procedure and online tool, Easy-MODA, has been developed to guide users through MODA creation for physics-based and data-based models, and their various combinations. Easy-MODA is available as a web-tool on the Enalos Cloud Platform (https://www.enaloscloud.novamechanics.com/insight/moda/). The tool streamlines the creation of detailed MODA documentation, even for complex multi-model workflows, and facilitates the registration of MODA workflows and documentation in a database, thereby increasing their Findability and thus Re-usability. This enhances communication, interoperability, and reproducibility in multiscale materials modelling and improves trust in the models through improved documentation. The use of the Easy-MODA tool is exemplified by a case study for nanotoxicity evaluation, involving interlinked models and data transformation, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the tool in integrating complex computational methodologies and its significant role in improving the FAIRness of scientific simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.