Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555463›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2024

Safety outcomes of suspected cardiac pathology assessed in an ambulatory rapid-access cardiology clinic.

Pok-Tin Tang, Benjamin Bussmann, Asad Shabbir, Andrew Elkington, William Orr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pok-Tin TangCardiology Senior House Officer.
Benjamin BussmannCardiology Registrar.
Asad ShabbirCardiology Registrar.
Andrew ElkingtonConsultant Cardiologist.
William OrrConsultant Cardiologist Department of Cardiology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, RG1 5AN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac pathology contributes to a significant proportion of emergency department (ED) attendances. Many could be managed as urgent outpatients and avoid hospital admission. We evaluated a novel rapidaccess general cardiology clinic to achieve this, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of baseline characteristics, investigations, final diagnoses, and 90-day safety (readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], mortality) from electronic records and conducted a patient experience survey. There were 216 ED referrals made between 1 June and 30 October 2020. The median time to review was two days (interquartile range 1-5). At 90 days, there were three (1.4%) representations requiring admission, two (0.9%) MACE, and no deaths. There were 205 (95%) successfully managed without hospital admission. Among surveyed patients, 96% felt they had concerns adequately addressed in a timely manner. In conclusion, our rapid-access cardiology clinic is a safe model for outpatient management of a range of cardiovascular presentations to the ED.

Indexed as

admission avoidancecardiologyemergency medicinerapidaccess clinic

Identifiers

PMID39555463
PMCPMC11562569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.