ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
Can artificial intelligence aid the urologists in detecting bladder cancer?
Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence advances in cystoscopy and imaging for bladder cancer: a narrative review.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Beyond Visual Consensus: Tiered Reference Framework for AI Cystoscopy Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Ureteral Orifice Detection in Ureteroscopic Images Based on Large-Kernel Convolutional Neural Networks and Attention-Based Feature Fusion.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based support system endoscopy, including cystoscopy, has shown promising results by training deep learning algorithms with large datasets of images and videos. This AI-aided cystoscopy has the potential to significantly transform the urological practice by assisting the urologists in identifying malignant areas, especially considering the diverse appearance of these lesions. Methods: Four databases, the PubMed, ProQuest, EBSCOHost, and ScienceDirect were searched, along with a manual hand search. Prospective and retrospective studies, experimental studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-control studies assessing the utilization of AI for the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy and comparing with the histopathology results as the reference standard were included. The following terms and their variants were used: "artificial intelligence," "cystoscopy," and "bladder cancer." The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The Moses-Littenberg model was used to derive the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristics (SROC) curve. Results: Five studies were selected for the analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.908-0.976) and 0.957 (95% CI: 0.923-0.977), respectively. Pooled diagnostic odd ratio was 449.79 (95% CI: 12.42-887.17). SROC curve (area under the curve: 0.988, 95% CI: 0.982-0.994) indicated a strong discriminating power of AI-aided cystoscopy in differentiation normal or benign bladder lesions from the malignant ones. Conclusions: Although the utilization of AI for aiding in the detection of bladder cancer through cystoscopy remains questionable, it has shown encouraging potential for enhancing the detection rates. Future studies should concentrate on identification of the patients groups which could derive maximum benefit from accurate identification of the bladder cancer, such as those with intermediate or high-risk invasive tumors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.