Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555430›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

The reused-disposable scope in flexible ureteroscopy for stones as a cost-conscious approach: Reporting the outcomes of a real-world practice multicenter study of 2183 patients by the team of worldwide endourological researchers group.

Vineet Gauhar, Olivier Traxer, Ravindra B Sabnis, Khi Yung Fong, Parimalsinh Gharia, Rishi Grover, Deepak Ragoori, Ee Jean Lim, Yiloren Tanidir, Amish Mehta and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  8. Editorial comment: The reusability conundrum: Considerations for reusing surgical disposables in research setting.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  9. Reused disposable ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery: A new concept arises?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  10. Editorial Comment.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology AP HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Ravindra B SabnisDepartment of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Khi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Parimalsinh GhariaDepartment of Urology, Icon Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Rishi GroverDepartment of Urology, Icon Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Deepak RagooriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ee Jean LimDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Yiloren TanidirDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Amish MehtaDepartment of Urology, B T Savani Kidney Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
Mehmet Ilker GökceDepartment of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Mohamed Amine LakmichiDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Mohammed the VI of Marrakesh, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Boyke SoebhaliDepartment of Urology, Abdul Wahab Sjahranie Hospital, Medical Faculty Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Nariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ben H ChewDepartment of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Southampton, NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Daniele CastellaniDepartment of Clinical Science, Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Polytechnic University of Le Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess complications and stone-free rate of flexible ureteroscopy (FU) reusing disposable scopes (RDS) after repeated sterilization. Methods: Data from adults from 11 centers were retrospectively reviewed (January 2020-December 2022). Inclusion criteria were proximal ureteral/renal stone(s). All cases were performed using an RDS to save costs for patients who come from economically challenged environments. Residual fragments (RFs) were defined as single fragment ≥4 mm or multiple fragments of any size within 3 months. Continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range. Results: Two thousand one hundred and eighty-three patients were included, of whom 67.0% were male. Median age was 48.0 (36-59) years. The median stone diameter was 10.2 (9-14) mm. Flash sterilization was used in 90.2% (plasma in 60.5%). Approximately, 88% had FU with an RDS used ≤2 times (12%: 3-5 times). RDS needed to be changed intraoperatively in 3.9% of cases due to its malfunction. Commonly, defects in RDS function were reported in upward (1.6%) and downward deflection (6.5%) and image quality on white balancing (4.7%). Fever >38C was seen in 13.7% of cases, and sepsis in 0.5%. RFs were found in 31.4% of cases. Lower pole (odds ratio [OR] 5.63) or pelvis stone (OR 4.67), faulty scopes (OR 12.8), and total operation time (OR 1.05) were factors associated with higher odds of RFs. Stone size (OR 1.09), positive urine culture (OR 1.67), interpolar stone (OR 1.68), and prestenting (OR 1.37) were factors associated with higher odds of fever/sepsis. Conclusions: RDS was used as a cost-conscious approach with a low rate of serious infections but with a high rate of RFs.

Identifiers

PMID39555430
PMCPMC11567569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.