Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555422›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Performance and Clinical Implications of VI-RADS in detecting muscle invasion in bladder tumors: A prospective observational study.

Bommireddy V Reddy, Kasi Viswanath Gali, Arun Chawla, Anshuman Singh, Sunil Pillai Bhaskara, Padmaraj Hegde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bommireddy V ReddyDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kasi Viswanath GaliDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Arun ChawlaDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Anshuman SinghDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Sunil Pillai BhaskaraDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Padmaraj HegdeDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bladder cancer staging is pivotal for guiding therapeutic decisions. In this study, the primary objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), The study aimed to classify bladder tumors as either nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancers or muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBC) using the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scoring. A secondary objective of the study focused on the accuracy of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) in comparison to mpMRI. Methods: Thirty-three patients with bladder tumors were enrolled and underwent both mpMRI and bpMRI scoring assessments. VI-RADS scores were assigned and subsequently compared with histopathological findings posttransurethral resection of bladder tumor., Statistical measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for VI-RADS scores at cutoff thresholds of ≥4 and 5. Results: MpMRI at a VI-RADS cutoff of ≥4 yielded an 83.33% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a diagnostic accuracy of 90.91%. At a cutoff of 5, sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 77.27%, and diagnostic accuracy was 84.85%. bpMRI at a cutoff of ≥4 showed an 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with diagnostic accuracy matching mpMRI at 90.91%. Conclusions: This prospective analysis demonstrates that VI-RADS scoring with mpMRI provides reliable diagnostic accuracy for bladder cancer staging. mpMRI exhibits high sensitivity and specificity at a cutoff of ≥ 4, making it a robust tool for MIBC detection. bpMRI is an effective alternative in select patients. The study validates the use of VI-RADS scoring in clinical practice for effective treatment planning.

Identifiers

PMID39555422
PMCPMC11567586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.