Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555421›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: The potential of machine learning models and neural networks to predict biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Gurpremjit Singh, Mayank Agrawal, Gagandeep Talwar, Sanket Kankaria, Gopal Sharma, Puneet Ahluwalia, Gagan Gautam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gurpremjit SinghDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Mayank AgrawalDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Gagandeep TalwarDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Sanket KankariaDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Gopal SharmaDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Puneet AhluwaliaDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Gagan GautamDepartment of Urology, Medanta the Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of machine learning (ML) and neural network (NN) models versus traditional statistical methods for estimating biochemical recurrence (BCR) in men following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: Patients who underwent RARP from November 2011 to July 2022 were taken in the study. Patients with BCR were assigned to Group 2, whereas those without BCR were placed in Group 1. Preoperative and postoperative parameters, together with demographic data, were recorded in the database. This study used one NN, the radial basis function NN (RBFNN), and two ML approaches, the K-nearest neighbor and XGboost ML models, to predict BCR. Results: Following the application of exclusion criteria, 516 patients were deemed eligible for the study. Of those, 234 (45.3%) developed BCR, and 282 (54.7%) did not. The results showed that the median follow-up period was 24 (15-42) months, and the median BCR diagnosis was 12.23 ± 15.58 months. The area under the curve (AUC) for the Cox proportional hazard analysis was 0.77. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the XGBoost and K closest neighbor models were 0.82 and 0.69, respectively. The RBFNN's AUC was 0.82. Conclusions: The classical statistical model was outperformed by XGBoost and RBFNN models in predicting BCR.

Identifiers

PMID39555421
PMCPMC11567574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.