ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024
Our Experience of 500 Chemo Port Placements with Cephalic Vein Cut Down Technique-A Saviour for Cancer Treatment.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implantable chemoport is a very useful device for long-term venous access for infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs and other agents. Niederhuber et al. (Surgery 92:706-712, 1982) reported on the first use of the totally implantable central venous port system (TICVPS) in 1982. Five hundred patients undergoing surgical implantation of chemoports in Bharath Cancer Hospital, Mysore, India, between September 2020 and June 2022 were included in this prospective observational cohort study. Five hundred chemoport implantations were available for analysis. The cephalic vein cut down technique was attempted in 500 patients and successful in 410 patients (82.2%). There were no intraoperative complications. Venous access device systems are nowadays widely used in cancer patients to facilitate frequent perfusions of chemotherapy (Vescia et al. in Ann Oncol 19(1):9-15, 2008). The placement of totally implanted venous access devices started 30 years ago. Since then, different techniques were established to reduce complications and to make the implantation safe and comfortable for patients (Teichgraber et al. in Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(5):975-979, 2009). The cephalic vein cutdown approach for CICVAD placement appears to be a safe and better alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach in cancer patients. Cephalic vein cut down approach is LESS with More benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.