ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2024
Adamantinoma: A SEER-based Epidemiological Analysis.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adamantinoma of Bone: A Structured Narrative Review of Clinical Outcomes, Recurrence Patterns, and Metastatic Behaviour.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Review
- Article
- Population-based histologic analysis of craniopharyngioma demographics and treatment in the US from 2000 to 2020.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adamantinoma (AD) is a rare bone cancer accounting for less than 0.1-0.5% of all primary bone tumors. No consensus guidelines exist for the treatment of this disease and long-term (twenty-year) survival has yet to be explored. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was queried for patients with a diagnosis of primary AD (ICD-O-3 code 9261/3). Demographic and treatment variables were analyzed via Fisher's Exact Test and 20-year overall survival (20y OS) was assessed via log-rank analysis. Seventy-four patients with AD were identified; median age was 20-24 years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients < 25 years of age at diagnosis with AD had increased 20y OS compared to those > 24 years (HR = 0.28; p = 0.028), while no other variables influenced survival. Subanalysis demonstrated patients > 40 years saw decreased survival (46% [11%, 81%]) compared to those ≤ 40 years (96% [89%, 104%]; p = 0.005). Patients ≤ 40 years of age at diagnosis were more likely to have local disease (78% of all 49 local cases) and less likely to have distant disease (0% of two cases) compared to patients > 40 years (p = 0.017). Stratifying by surgical procedure, no difference in 20y OS was appreciated (p = 0.12). Younger age at diagnosis provides mortality benefit and increased proportion of localized disease for those diagnosed with AD. No other demographic or treatment variables were found to influence 20y OS. Population-based analysis of AD is limited both by disease rarity and incomplete coding within SEER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.