ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Controlling Alzheimer's disease by deep brain stimulation based on a data-driven cortical network model.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims to explore the control effect of DBS on Alzheimer's disease (AD) from a neurocomputational perspective. Firstly, a data-driven cortical network model is constructed using the Diffusion Tensor Imaging data. Then, a typical electrophysiological feature of EEG slowing in AD is reproduced by reducing the synaptic connectivity parameters. The corresponding changes in kinetic behavior mainly include an oscillation decrease in the amplitude and frequency of the pyramidal neuron population. Subsequently, DBS current with specific parameters is introduced into three potential targets of the hippocampus, the nucleus accumbens and the olfactory tubercle, respectively. The results indicate that applying DBS to simulated mild AD patients induces an increase in relative alpha power, a decrease in relative theta power, and a significant rightward shift of the dominant frequency. This is consistent with the EEG reversal in pharmacological treatments for AD. Further, the optimal stimulation strategy of DBS is investigated through spectral and statistical analyses. Specifically, the pathological symptoms of AD could be alleviated by adjusting the critical parameters of DBS, and the control effect of DBS on various targets is that the hippocampus is superior to the olfactory tubercle and nucleus accumbens. Finally, using correlation analysis between the power increments and the nodal degrees, it is concluded that the control effect of DBS is related to the importance of the nodes in the brain network. This study provides a theoretical guidance for determining DBS targets and parameters, which may have a substantial impact on the development of DBS treatment for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.