ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Affective EEG-based cross-session person identification using hierarchical graph embedding.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG Subject Identification and Open-Set Rejection Across Paradigms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable Spectral Features for Cross-Session EEG Biometric Identification and Verification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Brain Signal for Secure EEG Biometric Authentication: A Comprehensive Survey.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The electroencephalogram (EEG) signal is being investigated as a more confidential biometric for person identification. Despite recent advancements, a persistent challenge lies in the influence of variations in affective states. Affective states consistently exist during data collection, regardless of the protocol used. Additionally, the inherently non-stationary nature of EEG makes it susceptible to fluctuations in affective states over time. Therefore, it would be highly crucial to perform precise EEG-based person identification under varying affective states. This paper employed an integrated Multi-scale Convolution and Graph Pooling network (MCGP) to mitigate the impact of affective state variations. MCGP utilized multiple 1D convolutions at different scales to dynamically extract and fuse features. Additionally, a graph pooling layer with an attention mechanism was incorporated to generate hierarchical graph embeddings. These embeddings were concatenated as inputs for a fully connected classification layer. Experiments were conducted on the SEED and SEED-V dataset, revealing that MCGP achieved an average accuracy of 85.51% for SEED and 88.69% for SEED-V in cross-session conditions involving mixed affective states. Under single affective state cross-session scenario, MCGP achieved an average accuracy of 85.75% for SEED and 88.06% for SEED-V for the same affective states, while obtaining 79.57% for SEED and 84.52% for SEED-V for different affective states. Results indicated that, compared to the baseline methods, MCGP effectively mitigated the impact of variations in affective states across different sessions. In single affective state cross-session scenario, identification performance for the same affective states was slightly higher than that for different affective states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.