Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555289›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Emotional reactivity and its impact on neural circuitry for attention-emotion interaction through regression-based machine learning model.

Raghavendra Prasad, Shashikanta Tarai, Arindam Bit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raghavendra PrasadDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, NIT Raipur, Raipur, India.
Shashikanta TaraiDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, NIT Raipur, Raipur, India.
Arindam BitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, NIT Raipur, Raipur, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-8324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global-local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global-local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global-local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z.

Indexed as

AttentionCRAMMachine learningPositive–negative emotionsRegression

Identifiers

PMID39555289
PMCPMC11564434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.