ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Emotional reactivity and its impact on neural circuitry for attention-emotion interaction through regression-based machine learning model.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cortex level connectivity between ACT-R modules during EEG-based n-back task.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attentional paradigm can have a significant influence on the processing and experience of positive and negative emotions. Attentional mechanism refers to the tendency to selectively attend to a particular stimulus while ignoring others. In the context of emotions, individuals may exhibit attentional biases towards either positive or negative emotional stimuli. By directing attention towards a specific stimulus, individuals can modulate their emotional responses. When attention is directed towards negative or threatening stimuli, it can intensify negative emotions such as fear, sadness, anger and anxiety. Conversely, directing attention away from negative stimuli can reduce emotional reactivity and promote emotional regulation. Similarly, paying attention to positive stimuli can amplify positive emotions and facilitate positive emotional experiences. Attentional paradigms are also responsible for cognitive appraisal of emotional stimuli. The allocation of attention can shape how emotional stimuli are evaluated and categorized, influencing the subsequent emotional response. Since the relationship between attention and emotions is complex and can vary across individuals and contexts, it is important to understand the underlying cognitive neural dynamics of the same. Custom rank allocation model (CRAM) was used to decode the underlying neural dynamics of cognitive and emotional resource sharing through the non-significant EEG channels. During the main effect of global-local (GL), CRAM ranks and scores indicated that the EEG channels C4, PZ, OZ, and P4 were found to be the most non-significant channels. Similarly, CRAM ranks and scores of the interaction effects between global-local and positive emotion-negative emotion and the interaction effects between global-local and frequent-deviant-equal indicated midline central EEG channels CZ, PZ, FZ and OZ to be the main contributor of the cognitive and emotional resources to others. Understanding the dynamics of attention-emotion conflicts with reference to significant and non-significant channels is important to gain insights into the complex computational interplay between attention and emotion, leading to a deeper understanding of human cognition and emotion regulation. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-024-10106-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.