Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555285›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

A working memory model based on recurrent neural networks using reinforcement learning.

Mengyuan Wang, Yihong Wang, Xuying Xu, Xiaochuan Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengyuan WangInstitute for Cognitive Neurodynamics, Center for Intelligent Computing, School of Mathematics, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 China.
Yihong WangInstitute for Cognitive Neurodynamics, Center for Intelligent Computing, School of Mathematics, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 China.
Xuying XuInstitute for Cognitive Neurodynamics, Center for Intelligent Computing, School of Mathematics, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 China.
Xiaochuan PanInstitute for Cognitive Neurodynamics, Center for Intelligent Computing, School of Mathematics, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 China.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-1140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous electrophysiological experiments have reported that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is involved in the process of working memory. PFC neurons continue firing to maintain stimulus information in the delay period without external stimuli in working memory tasks. Further findings indicate that while the activity of single neurons exhibits strong temporal and spatial dynamics (heterogeneity), the activity of population neurons can encode spatiotemporal information of stimuli stably and reliably. From the perspective of neural networks, the computational mechanism underlying this phenomenon is not well demonstrated. The main purpose of this paper is to adopt a new strategy to explore the neural computation mechanism of working memory. We used reinforcement learning to train a recurrent neural network model to learn a spatial working memory task. The model is composed of a decision network and a baseline network. The decision network is responsible for updating strategies to make action choices, while the baseline network evaluates action choices to predict rewards. Simulated results demonstrate that the model can perform the spatial working memory task. The activity of the recurrent units has characteristics such as temporal dynamics and preferred direction selectivity, but their population activity encodes the stimulus information stably during the delay period in a low-dimensional subspace. These activity characteristics displayed by the model units are similar to those of PFC neurons observed in the same experiments. Meanwhile, as the network model continued learning the task, the temporal stability and spatial separability of the stimulus information encoded by the activity of model units in the low-dimensional subspace gradually strengthened, and the accuracy of the network's action choices also increased. In summary, this network model provides a new simulation method for spatial working memory tasks and a new perspective for understanding the characteristics of neuron activity in the PFC.

Indexed as

Population codingPrefrontal cortexRecurrent neural networkReinforcement learningSpatial working memory

Identifiers

PMID39555285
PMCPMC11564475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.