ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2024
Vagus nerve electrical stimulation in the recovery of upper limb motor functional impairment after ischemic stroke.
Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physical Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Evidence Grading.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Dysfunction After Stroke: Prognostic Markers for Recovery.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- TyG-BMI as a predictor of ischemic stroke over 10 years in middle-aged and older adults: findings from the China cardiometabolic disease and cancer cohort (4C) study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Multimodal therapeutic efficacy assessment of vagus nerve stimulation in stroke: integrated application of imaging, electrophysiological, and behavioral indicators.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke (IS) is characterized by high mortality, disability rates, and a high risk of recurrence. Motor dysfunction, such as limb hemiparesis, dysphagia, auditory disorders, and speech disorders, usually persists after stroke, which imposes a heavy burden on society and the health care system. Traditional rehabilitation therapies may be ineffective in promoting functional recovery after stroke, and alternative strategies are urgently needed. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved invasive vagus nerve stimulation (iVNS) for the improvement of refractory epilepsy, treatment-resistant depression, obesity, and moderate to severe upper limb motor impairment following chronic ischemic stroke. Additionally, the FDA has approved transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) for the improvement of cluster headaches and acute migraines. Recent studies have demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has neuroprotective effects in both transient and permanent cerebral ischemia animal models, significantly improving upper limb motor impairments, auditory deficits, and swallowing difficulties. Firstly, this article reviews two potential neuronal death pathways following IS, including autophagy and inflammatory responses. Then delves into the current status of preclinical and clinical research on the functional recovery following IS with VNS, as well as the potential mechanisms mediating its neuroprotective effects. Finally, the optimal parameters and timing of VNS application are summarized, and the future challenges and directions of VNS in the treatment of IS are discussed. The application of VNS in stroke rehabilitation research has reached a critical stage, and determining how to safely and effectively translate this technology into clinical practice is of utmost importance. Further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of VNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.