Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555282›Full record

ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2024

Vagus nerve electrical stimulation in the recovery of upper limb motor functional impairment after ischemic stroke.

Long Chen, Huixin Gao, Zhongpeng Wang, Bin Gu, Wanqi Zhou, Meijun Pang, Kuo Zhang, Xiuyun Liu, Dong Ming

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Long ChenAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Huixin GaoAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Zhongpeng WangAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Bin GuHaihe Laboratory of Brain-computer Interaction and Human-machine Integration, Tianjin, 300392 China.
Wanqi ZhouAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Meijun PangAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Kuo ZhangAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Xiuyun LiuAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.
Dong MingAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) is characterized by high mortality, disability rates, and a high risk of recurrence. Motor dysfunction, such as limb hemiparesis, dysphagia, auditory disorders, and speech disorders, usually persists after stroke, which imposes a heavy burden on society and the health care system. Traditional rehabilitation therapies may be ineffective in promoting functional recovery after stroke, and alternative strategies are urgently needed. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved invasive vagus nerve stimulation (iVNS) for the improvement of refractory epilepsy, treatment-resistant depression, obesity, and moderate to severe upper limb motor impairment following chronic ischemic stroke. Additionally, the FDA has approved transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) for the improvement of cluster headaches and acute migraines. Recent studies have demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has neuroprotective effects in both transient and permanent cerebral ischemia animal models, significantly improving upper limb motor impairments, auditory deficits, and swallowing difficulties. Firstly, this article reviews two potential neuronal death pathways following IS, including autophagy and inflammatory responses. Then delves into the current status of preclinical and clinical research on the functional recovery following IS with VNS, as well as the potential mechanisms mediating its neuroprotective effects. Finally, the optimal parameters and timing of VNS application are summarized, and the future challenges and directions of VNS in the treatment of IS are discussed. The application of VNS in stroke rehabilitation research has reached a critical stage, and determining how to safely and effectively translate this technology into clinical practice is of utmost importance. Further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of VNS.

Indexed as

Ischemic strokeMotor dysfunctionNeuroinflammationVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39555282
PMCPMC11564590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.