ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Quantitative analysis and machine learning-based interpretation of EEG signals in coma and brain-death diagnosis.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight deep learning model for nonconvulsive status epilepticus diagnosis using EEG time-frequency analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of Epilepsy Treatment Strategies Based on an Astrocyte-Neuron-Coupled Network Model.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Dynamic reconstruction of electroencephalogram data using RBF neural networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) reflects brain activity and is crucial for diagnosing states such as coma and brain-death. However, the clinical interpretation of EEG signals faces challenges due to the patients' faint brain activity and the complexities of the intensive care unit environment, further compounded by the absence of quantified standards for signal analysis. This study developed an improved denoise method tailored to the characteristics of Coma/Brain-Death EEG signals. The spectral feature map derived from the EEG signal via Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) with a mode number (K) of 5, represents the frequency-based energy distribution. Subsequently, by integrating the Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) algorithm with Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm employing cross-validation method, distinctive energy features in the 4-9Hz frequency band of coma patients compared to brain-death patients are identified. An accuracy of 99.59% and an F1-score of 99.61% for the SVM classifier demonstrate the high precision and reliability of the method. The application of specific machine learning algorithms provides robust theoretical support for the nuanced clinical interpretation of EEG signals across different levels of consciousness. This approach not only deepens scientific understanding of EEG signal variations associated with distinct consciousness levels but also establishes a solid foundation for future research aimed at quantifying EEG signal characteristics for the diagnosis and monitoring of brain diseases like epilepsy, Alzheimer's, and sleep disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.