Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555262›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024

Multiresolution feature fusion for smart diagnosis of schizophrenia in adolescents using EEG signals.

Rakesh Ranjan, Bikash Chandra Sahana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rakesh RanjanDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna-, 800005 India.ORCID 0000-0002-0089-1734
Bikash Chandra SahanaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology Patna, Patna-, 800005 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies on early detection of schizophrenia (SZ) have utilized all available channels or employed set of a few time domain or frequency domain features, while a limited number of features may not be sufficient enough to perform diagnosis efficiently. To encounter these problems, an automated diagnosis model is proposed for the efficient diagnosis of schizophrenia symptomatic adolescent subjects from electroencephalogram (EEG) signals via machine intelligence. A publicly accessible EEG dataset featuring 16-channels EEG obtained from 84 adolescents (45 SZ symptomatic and 39 healthy control) is used to demonstrate the work. Initially, the signals are decomposed into sub-bands using two multi-resolution signal analysis methods: Empirical Wavelet Transform and Empirical mode decomposition. 75 unique features from each sub-bands are extracted and the few selective prominent features are applied to machine learning classifiers for optimal sub-band selection. Subsequently, a hybrid model is proposed, combining convolutional neural network (CNN) and ensemble bagged tree, incorporating both deep learning and handcrafted features to perform SZ diagnosis. This innovative model achieved superior classification performance compared to existing methods, offering a promising approach for SZ diagnosis. Furthermore, the study explores the impact of different brain regions and combined regional data in SZ diagnosis comprehensively. Hence, this computer-assisted decision-making model minimizes the limitations of prior studies by providing a more robust and efficient diagnostic system for schizophrenia.

Indexed as

ClassificationConvolutional neural networkElectroencephalogramEmpirical mode decompositionEmpirical wavelet transformFeature fusion

Identifiers

PMID39555262
PMCPMC11564624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.