ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024
Adapting the design of the ongoing RAMPART trial in response to external evidence: An example for trials which take many years to run and report.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03288532 (An International Investigator-led Phase III Multi Arm Multi Stage Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Platform Trial of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resected Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An International Investigator-led Phase III Multi Arm Multi Stage Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Platform Trial of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resected Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) at High or Intermediate Risk of Relapse
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparator Event Rates, Baseline Activity, and Operational Selection Pressure in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Analysis.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical trials to establish the efficacy of new agents in the adjuvant cancer setting typically take many years to complete. During that time, external factors can impact recruitment and reporting plans. An example is a new standard of care becoming available during the recruitment period. In this paper we describe how we modified the design of the RAMPART trial (NCT03288532) which was set up to investigate immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the adjuvant renal cancer setting. The trial had been initiated when no globally accepted adjuvant strategy after nephrectomy existed. A subsequent change in the standard of care for many patients with early renal cancer meant it was no longer feasible to continue to recruit. We needed to find a way to maximise the contribution that RAMPART participants could make to the evidence base for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy without introducing bias or detriment to the integrity of the trial results. We describe how we agreed and incorporated all design and timeline changes while remaining blinded to accumulating data within the trial, thus protecting the reliability of the future results. We share details of our design modifications to guide others who may have similar experiences, particularly as more agents and combinations of agents are developed and investigated in similar adjuvant settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.