ReviewTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2024
A systematic review of prostate bed motion and anisotropic margins in post-prostatectomy external beam radiotherapy.
Review in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate bed (PB) motion may lead to geographical miss of the target volume in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT). Optimal clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins prevent geographical miss and unnecessary irradiation of normal tissue. There is little data available informing appropriate CTV to PTV margins in the post-prostatectomy setting. The purpose of this review was to quantify the inter-fraction and intra-fraction motion of the PB and draw a conclusion regarding the use of anisotropic CTV to PTV margins for post-prostatectomy RT treatment. Methodology: A search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was carried out using keywords (prostate bed [Title/Abstract]) AND (motion [Title/Abstract]). All study types assessing inter-fraction and/or intra-fraction motion of the PB based on imaging of soft tissue anatomy were included. Data on patient preparation, immobilisation, and image guidance was abstracted from the included studies. Magnitude of PB motion along with the estimated CTV to PTV margins calculated was also tabulated. Quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS tool. Results: Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. The largest magnitude of inter-fraction PB motion occurs in the anterior-posterior direction. This motion is attributed to the influence of the bladder and rectal volume on the PB. The PB moves independently of bone and the magnitude of motion varies between the superior and inferior portions of the prostate bed. Conclusion: Anisotropic CTV to PTV margins are appropriate for use in the post-prostatectomy setting and their implementation for treatment planning purposes are warranted based on the evidence reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.