ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Baseline Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Seen Through the Free Diabetes Screening (FDS) Program.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patients' Perspectives on Social Barriers to Care and the Acceptability and Impact of a Community Health Worker Program in Outpatient Ophthalmology.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize the baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients seen through the Free Diabetic Screening (FDS) program, a free diabetic retinopathy screening program for uninsured patients, in the ophthalmology resident clinic at the Wilmer Eye Institute. Patients and Methods: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study included uninsured patients ≥18 years with diabetes mellitus seen through the FDS clinic from 2013 to 2023. Data extraction was performed using manual chart review of the first FDS visit, and automated extraction of the data warehouse related to all other office visits. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at presentation, treatments, and follow-ups were collected. Results: A total of 422 patients were included in this study (mean age 52 years; 59% female; 47% Hispanic; 49% Spanish as primary language). One-third of patients had some form of diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema, and 12% had vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy at presentation. In all, nearly 10% of patients were referred for further specialty care, and 71% of these patients completed at least one follow-up visit. The majority of patients (55%) returned for care as recommended and were followed for a mean length of 200 weeks and 10 office visits. Conclusion: The FDS clinic provided much needed diabetic retinopathy screening and treatment for uninsured patients in Baltimore City and surrounding areas. This study highlights the need for strong integration between initial screening and downstream services, as nearly 10% of patients require further sub-specialty intervention or care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.