Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555045›Full record

ReviewWater research X2024

A critical review of ultra-violet light emitting diodes as a one water disinfection technology.

Kyle D Rauch, Sean A MacIsaac, Bailey Reid, Toni J Mullin, Ariel J Atkinson, Anthony L Pimentel, Amina K Stoddart, Karl G Linden, Graham A Gagnon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Water research X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kyle D RauchCentre for Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Sean A MacIsaacCentre for Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Bailey ReidCentre for Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Toni J MullinCentre for Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Ariel J AtkinsonWater Quality Research and Development, Southern Nevada Water Authority, 100 S City Pkwy Suite 700, Las Vegas 89106, NV, USA.
Anthony L PimentelWater Technology Group, Black & Veatch, 550 Hope St Suite 2250, Los Angeles 90071, CA, USA.
Amina K StoddartCentre for Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Karl G LindenDepartment of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Dr, Boulder 80303, CO, USA.
Graham A GagnonCentre for Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV light emitting diode (LED) disinfection technologies have advanced over the last decade and expanded the design space for applications in point of use, industrial, and now full-scale water treatment. This literature review examines the progression of UV LED technologies from 2007 to 2023 using key features such as total optical power, price, and wall-plug efficiency. The review found that optical power is increasing while the price per Watt is decreasing; however, the wall plug energy (WPE) is slowly improving over the last decade. These factors govern the feasibility of many UV LEDs applications and establish the current state of the art for these technologies. An analysis of inactivation rate constants for low-pressure, medium-pressure, and UV LED sources was undertaken and provides a comprehensive view of how current UV LED technologies compare to traditional technologies. This comparison found that UV LEDs perform comparably vs conventional UV technologies when disinfecting bacteria and viruses. Furthermore, comparison of reported reduction equivalent fluences for UV LED flow-through reactors at the bench-, pilot-, and full-scale were explored in this review, and it was found that LED treatment is becoming more effective at handling increased flowrates and has been proven to work at full-scale. UV LEDs do however require additional research into the impacts of water matrices at different wavelengths and the impact that each available LED wavelength has on disinfection. Overall, this work provides a broad assessment of UV disinfection technologies and serves as a state-of-the-art reference document for those who are interested in understanding this rapidly developing technology.

Indexed as

DisinfectionSustainable water treatmentUV LEDWater-energy nexus

Identifiers

PMID39555045
PMCPMC11568360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.