Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39555043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Seroprevalence and risk factors for brucellosis amongst livestock and humans in a multi-herd ranch system in Kagera, Tanzania.

Beatus Lyimo, Ephrasia Hugho, Coletha Mathew, Charles Mayenga, Abdul Hamid Lukambagire, Samson Lyimo, Lidia Munuo, Maurice Byukusenge, Jodie Withall, Roland T Ashford and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The economic burden of brucellosis in Western Iran.Tropical medicine and health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Beatus Lyimo *Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Ephrasia Hugho *Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.
Coletha Mathew *Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Charles Mayenga *Tanzania Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Abdul Hamid LukambagireKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.
Samson LyimoNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Lidia MunuoNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Maurice ByukusengeDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Jodie WithallDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, United Kingdom.
Roland T AshfordDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, United Kingdom.
Blandina T MmbagaKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.
Zachariah MakondoTanzania Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
John McGivenDepartment of International Development, Innovation and Business, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, United Kingdom.
Jessica Radzio-BasuHuck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Erika GandaDepartment of Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Earl A MiddlebrookLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
Andrew W BartlowLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
Jeanne M FairLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
Gabriel ShirimaNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Nammalwar SriranganathanVirginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Rudovick R KazwalaSokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Peter J HudsonHuck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Isabella M CattadoriHuck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Vivek KapurNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Joram J BuzaNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.
Robab KataniNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brucellosis remains a significant health and economic challenge for livestock and humans globally. Despite its public health implications, the factors driving the endemic persistence of Methods: A cross-sectional sero-epidemiological study was conducted in 2023 in Tanzania's Karagwe District, involving 725 livestock (cattle, goats, sheep) from 10 herds and 112 humans from associated camps. Seroprevalence was assessed using competitive ELISA while epidemiological data were collected via questionnaires. Generalized Linear Models and Contrast Analysis were used to identify risk factors for infection. Results: Overall seroprevalence was 34% in livestock and 41% in humans. Goats exhibited the highest prevalence (69.2%), while cattle had the lowest (22.6%). Mixed-species herds (Odds Ratio, OR = 2.96, CI [1.90-4.60]) and small ruminants-only herds (OR = 6.54, CI [3.65-11.72]) showed a significantly higher risk of seropositivity compared to cattle-only herds. Older cattle (OR = 5.23, CI [2.70-10.10]) and lactating females (OR = 2.87, CI [1.78-4.63]) represented significant risks for brucellosis in livestock. In humans, close contact with animals (OR = 7.20, CI [1.97-36.31]) and handling animals during parturition or aborted fetuses (OR = 2.37, CI [1.01-5.58]) were significant risk factors. Notably, no spatial association was found in seroprevalence between herds and nearby human communities. Conclusion: The lack of spatial correlation between livestock and human seroprevalence suggests complex transmission dynamics, potentially involving endemic circulation in livestock and human infections from multiple sources of exposure to livestock. This study highlights the need for comprehensive zoonotic risk education and targeted intervention strategies. Further research is crucial to elucidate transmission pathways and improve

Indexed as

BrucellosisGoatsLivestockAdultAnimalsBrucellaCattleCross-Sectional StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic Studiesbrucellosislivestocklow-middle-income countriespublic healthTanzaniazoonotic

Identifiers

PMID39555043
PMCPMC11563785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.