SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024
The effect of occupational exposure to organic dust on lung function parameters among African industrial workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Organizational contextual stimuli and health belief among migrant workers with pneumoconiosis: the mediating role of perceived health status.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- What do the clinical and respiratory functional assessments of woodworkers in Parakou, West Africa, reveal?Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- Silicosis and Pulmonary Functions Among Residents Exposed to Dust in Saraburi Thailand.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Inadequate ventilation and improper use of personal protective equipment are often observed in many occupational settings with a high risk of dust and other fine particle exposure. Workers who are exposed to dust at work may suffer from respiratory difficulties. Previous systematic reviews on organic dust exposure and its association with respiratory health outcomes did not provide a comprehensive assessment. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the reported effects of organic dust exposure on lung function parameters among African industrial workers. Methods: A compressive literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Embase, the Web of Science, African Journals Online, and ScienceDirect databases to identify relevant studies for the review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The lung function indices including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV Results: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 32 studies involving 7,085 participants were included from 13,529 identified studies. The estimated mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were as follows: -0.53 [-0.83 to -0.36] L for FVC, -0.60 [-0.77 to -0.43] L for FEV Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the lung function indices, such as FVC, FEV Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024527139.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.