Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554990›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Enhancing random forest predictive performance for foot and mouth disease outbreaks in Uganda: a calibrated uncertainty prediction approach for varying distributions.

Geofrey Kapalaga, Florence N Kivunike, Susan Kerfua, Daudi Jjingo, Savino Biryomumaisho, Justus Rutaisire, Paul Ssajjakambwe, Swidiq Mugerwa, Seguya Abbey, Mulindwa H Aaron and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Geofrey KapalagaDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computing and Information Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Florence N KivunikeDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computing and Information Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan KerfuaDepartment of Vaccinology, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Daudi JjingoAfrican Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics (ACE-B), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Savino BiryomumaishoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Bio-security, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Justus RutaisireDepartment of Vaccinology, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul SsajjakambweDepartment of Vaccinology, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Swidiq MugerwaDepartment of Vaccinology, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Seguya AbbeyDepartment of Vaccinology, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Mulindwa H AaronDepartment of Vaccinology, National Livestock Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Yusuf KiwalaCollege of Business and Management Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease poses a significant threat to both domestic and wild cloven-hoofed animals, leading to severe economic losses and jeopardizing food security. While machine learning models have become essential for predicting foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks, their effectiveness is often compromised by distribution shifts between training and target datasets, especially in non-stationary environments. Despite the critical impact of these shifts, their implications in foot-and-mouth disease outbreak prediction have been largely overlooked. This study introduces the Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction approach, designed to enhance the performance of Random Forest models in predicting foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks across varying distributions. The Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction approach effectively addresses distribution shifts by calibrating uncertain instances for pseudo-label annotation, allowing the active learner to generalize more effectively to the target domain. By utilizing a probabilistic calibration model, Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction pseudo-annotates the most informative instances, refining the active learner iteratively and minimizing the need for human annotation and outperforming existing methods known to mitigate distribution shifts. This reduces costs, saves time, and lessens the dependence on domain experts while achieving outstanding predictive performance. The results demonstrate that Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction significantly enhances predictive performance in non-stationary environments, achieving an accuracy of 98.5%, Area Under the Curve of 0.842, recall of 0.743, precision of 0.855, and an F1 score of 0.791. These findings underscore Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction's ability to overcome the vulnerabilities of existing ML models, offering a robust solution for foot-and-mouth disease outbreak prediction and contributing to the broader field of predictive modeling in infectious disease management.

Indexed as

calibrated uncertainty predictiondistribution shiftsfoot-and-mouth diseaseperformance improvement ratesrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39554990
PMCPMC11564173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.