ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Enhancing random forest predictive performance for foot and mouth disease outbreaks in Uganda: a calibrated uncertainty prediction approach for varying distributions.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal trends of foot and mouth disease (FMD) in Bangladesh from 2017 to 2023 and their associations with climatic factors and machine learning (ML) based prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Pathways, outputs and impact of NIH-supported bioinformatics and genomics graduate trainees in Africa.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Spatial Patterns and Epidemiological Drivers of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreaks in Uganda.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of fever among under-five children in Ethiopia: A national-level study.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot-and-mouth disease poses a significant threat to both domestic and wild cloven-hoofed animals, leading to severe economic losses and jeopardizing food security. While machine learning models have become essential for predicting foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks, their effectiveness is often compromised by distribution shifts between training and target datasets, especially in non-stationary environments. Despite the critical impact of these shifts, their implications in foot-and-mouth disease outbreak prediction have been largely overlooked. This study introduces the Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction approach, designed to enhance the performance of Random Forest models in predicting foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks across varying distributions. The Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction approach effectively addresses distribution shifts by calibrating uncertain instances for pseudo-label annotation, allowing the active learner to generalize more effectively to the target domain. By utilizing a probabilistic calibration model, Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction pseudo-annotates the most informative instances, refining the active learner iteratively and minimizing the need for human annotation and outperforming existing methods known to mitigate distribution shifts. This reduces costs, saves time, and lessens the dependence on domain experts while achieving outstanding predictive performance. The results demonstrate that Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction significantly enhances predictive performance in non-stationary environments, achieving an accuracy of 98.5%, Area Under the Curve of 0.842, recall of 0.743, precision of 0.855, and an F1 score of 0.791. These findings underscore Calibrated Uncertainty Prediction's ability to overcome the vulnerabilities of existing ML models, offering a robust solution for foot-and-mouth disease outbreak prediction and contributing to the broader field of predictive modeling in infectious disease management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.