ArticleACS materials Au2024
In Vitro Osteo-Immunological Responses of Bioactive Calcium Phosphate-Containing Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Composites: A Potential Alternative to Poly(methyl methacrylate) Bone Cement.
Article in ACS materials Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Platelet Responses to Urethane Dimethacrylate-Based Bone Cements Containing Monocalcium Phosphate/ε-Polylysine: Role of ε-Polylysine inACS materials Au · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This investigation developed new composite bone cements using urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), poly(propylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PPGDMA), and hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), with micrometer-sized aluminosilicate glass filler. Monocalcium phosphate monohydrate (MCPM) and hydroxyapatite (HA) particles were added to enhance biological performance, particularly osteo-immunomodulation. Free radical polymerization was triggered by mixing two pastes containing either benzoyl peroxide (BPO, an initiator) or N-tolyglycine glycidyl methacrylate (NTGGMA, an activator). Increasing butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT, an inhibitor) enabled a suitable delay after mixing at 25 °C for placement. At 37 °C, the delay time was reduced and the final conversion was enhanced. Findings also demonstrated the biocompatibility of the developed bone cement toward osteo-immunological cell lineages, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), fibroblasts, osteoclast precursor RAW 246.7 cells, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Notably, the cement with both MCPM and HA combined facilitated sufficient MSC growth, enabling subsequent mineralization while concurrently suppressing the proliferation of fibroblasts, osteoclast progenitors, and PBMCs. Furthermore, composite cement exhibited the capacity to differentially regulate osteoblast differentiation, cell-(in)dependent mineralization, osteoclastogenesis, and PBMC-mediated inflammatory responses at both cellular and molecular levels in vitro. These observations suggested their potential use for bone repair, especially in cases of inflammation-associated bone defects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.