Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554825›Full record

ReviewFood science of animal resources2024

Advanced Halal Authentication Methods and Technology for Addressing Non-Compliance Concerns in Halal Meat and Meat Products Supply Chain: A Review.

Artnice Mega Fathima, Laila Rahmawati, Anjar Windarsih, Suratno

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science of animal resources, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Artnice Mega FathimaResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing (PRTPP), National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Yogyakarta 55861, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8180-5529
Laila RahmawatiResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing (PRTPP), National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Yogyakarta 55861, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6351-3282
Anjar WindarsihResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing (PRTPP), National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Yogyakarta 55861, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-7575
SuratnoResearch Center for Food Technology and Processing (PRTPP), National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Yogyakarta 55861, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-8844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religious beliefs have a significant impact on consumer preferences, particularly in relation to food choices. Islam, like other religions, imposes specific dietary guidelines, notably regarding meat and meat products. However, ensuring compliance with halal standards across the entire meat and meat products supply chain presents considerable challenges. Instances of non-compliance, including improper slaughtering techniques, mislabeling, adulteration, and contamination, have caused concerns about the authenticity of halal status. To address these concerns, this review explores recent advancements in halal authentication methods and technology, focusing on practical objectives aimed at addressing non-compliance issues. It categorizes methods into four main areas of non-compliance concerns, providing a unique perspective compared to earlier reviews that primarily examined the progression of analytical methods. This classification offers a comprehensive analysis of the field's current status, facilitating the identification of research gaps and strategic recommendations for enhancing future halal authentication methods. Through the implementation of this novel approach, the review seeks to promote the development of a more robust framework for evaluating halal meat and meat products, safeguarding consumer trust and ensuring adherence to religious dietary guidelines in the future.

Indexed as

halalhalal authentication methodsmeatmeat productsnon-compliance concerns

Identifiers

PMID39554825
PMCPMC11564133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.