ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2024
Extended nonnegative matrix factorization for dynamic functional connectivity analysis of fMRI data.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Orthogonal Semi-Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Method for Dynamic Functional Connectivity Analysis and Its Application to Schizophrenia.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) analysis using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology has attracted increasing attention in revealing brain dynamics in recent years. Although the nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) method was applied to dynamic subgraph analysis to reveal brain dynamics, its application in DFC analysis was largely limited due to its nonnegative constraint on the input data. This study proposed the extended NMF (eNMF) method that allowed the input matrix and decomposed basis matrix to have negative values without altering the NMF algorithm. The eNMF method was applied to DFC analysis of both simulated and real resting fMRI data. The simulated data demonstrated that eNMF successfully decomposed the mixed-sign matrix into one positive matrix and one mixed-sign matrix. In contrast to K-means, eNMF extracted more accurate brain state patterns in all cases and estimated better DFC temporal properties for uneven brain state distribution. The real resting-fMRI data demonstrated that eNMF can provide more temporal measures of DFC and was more sensitive to detect intergroup differences of DFC than K-means. Results of eNMF revealed that the female group possibly showed worse relaxation and produced stronger spontaneous cognitive processes although they tended to spend more time in relaxation state and less time in states relevant to cognitive processes in contrast to the male group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.