ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2024
Rehabilitation utilization in malignant primary brain tumors compared to stroke and traumatic brain injury: Analysis using a large claim database.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Absolute risk of acquired brain injury and rehabilitation needs in Denmark, 2014-2023: a population-based prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- "We are a club none of us wanted to join": exploring brain tumor online discussion forum content.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is concern regarding the underutilization of rehabilitation services for the malignant primary brain tumor (MPBT) population following hospitalization. Our aim is to assess physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech-language pathology (SLP) use after an MPBT diagnosis, evaluate the trend from 2001 to 2018, and compare to traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke. Methods: Adult cases of MPBT, TBI, and stroke were extracted from MarketScan database. Inpatient and outpatient data were screened for inpatient rehabilitation use at the time of diagnosis and postdischarge outpatient PT, OT, and SLP over 12 months. Generalized linear regressions were used for analysis. Results: The cohort was composed of 3381 MPBT, 205 366 stroke, and 24 825 TBI patients. After diagnosis, 1% of MPBTs were discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and 3% to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF). Rehabilitation use at 12 months was 19% PT, 8% OT, and 6% SLP. These percentages were lower than stroke and TBI; stroke: 8% SNF, 8% IRF, 22% PT, 10% OT, and 8% SLP; TBI: 7% SNF, 7% IRF, 22% PT, 8% OT, and 6% SLP. Outpatient therapies increased from 2001 to 2018, with PT use consistently higher than OT and SLP. MPBT had the greatest increases in OT (7.95 times) and PT (3.89 times) compared to stroke and TBI, while stroke had the greatest increase in SLP (0.98 times). Conclusions: MPBT patients had the highest increase in OT and PT utilization when compared to stroke and TBI. However, there remains a utilization gap which demonstrates the need for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.