ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection on gastrointestinal function and nutritional status in patients with early gastric cancer.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) endangers the survival and prognosis of patients worldwide. Improving the prognosis of patients with early GC (EGC) is crucial to prolong their survival time.
aimTo analyze the effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on gastrointestinal function and nutritional status in patients with EGC.
methodsEighty patients with EGC between January 2021 and January 2024 were divided according to different surgical protocol into following two groups: 42 patients who underwent ESD in the ESD group and 38 patients treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the EMR group. Two groups were compared in the operative indices, lesion resection rate, postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function, nutritional status, and incidence of surgical complications.
resultsThe overall resection rate of the lesion in the ESD group was higher. The operative bleeding volume and operation time were higher and gastrointestinal ventilation time was shorter in the ESD group than those in the EMR group (
conclusionESD can promote the immediate recovery of patient's postoperative gastrointestinal function, improve their nutritional level, and signifies its application in patients with EGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.