ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024
The efficacy of acupuncture-assisted blind insertion of bullet nasointestinal tube method in patients with ischemic stroke: A retrospective study.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) acupuncture-assisted blind insertion of bullet nasointestinal tube method in patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: This is a retrospective study using clinical records of 180 patients with ischemic stroke, hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of the Zhejiang Province Tertiary Class A Hospital, Huzhou, China from July 2022 to June 2023. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the nasogastric tube insertion method. We selected 90 patients for each group from the database of records by using a random list method. Patients in the observation group underwent TCM acupuncture-assisted blind insertion of nasointestinal tube and those in the control group underwent the traditional bedside blind insertion of bullet nasointestinal tube. Success rate of tube insertion, average tube insertion time, intragastric insertion time, stomach time to jejunal insertion, patient comfort, and patient satisfaction in both groups were compared. Results: The success rate of nasointestinal tube insertion was significantly higher in the observation group compared to the control group (96.6% and 88.9%, p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the time of nasoenteral tube insertion into the stomach (p>0.05). The insertion time from stomach to jejunum in the observation group was significantly shorter than in the control group (p<0.05). The patient comfort and satisfaction levels were significantly higher in the observation group compared to the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: TCM acupuncture-assisted blind insertion of bullet nasointestinal tube method improves the success rate of tube insertion, shortens the average catheterization time from the stomach to the jejunum and improves patient's comfort and satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.