ReviewPakistan journal of medical sciences2024
Proton pump inhibitor use and risk of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Eprazole Sodium combined with somatostatin on treatment efficacy and coagulation function of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A retrospective study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Association between acid-suppressant use and self-reported stroke.BMC neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore a link between the use of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and the risk of stroke. Methods: Comprehensive literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL Library databases was carried out for observational studies establishing the link between PPI and a risk of stroke. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models were plotted. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on age, gender, PPI type, duration of follow-up, and propensity score matching (PSM). Results: The analysis included 12 studies, with considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 95%). PPI use did not affect the incidence of ischemic stroke (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.98-1.26). Subgroup analyses revealed that PPI use correlated with the risk of ischemic stroke, in particular in patients<65 years old (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.45), both males (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24) and females (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.10-1.33). The correlation varied depending on the PPI type, with pantoprazole showing elevated risk (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.43-1.93). Duration of follow-up or propensity score matching (PSM) did not impact the association. Conclusion: PPI use may be linked with ischemic stroke, particularly in individuals <65 years old and of all genders. The specific PPI type may also influence the risk. However, the cumulative analysis did not find any statistically significant association, and heterogeneity among studies was substantial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.