Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554642›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024

Effect of patient age and breast parenchymal density on Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BIRADS-4) Subcategorization.

Hadeel A Ghunaim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hadeel A GhunaimHadeel A Ghunaim, MBBS. Assistant Professor and Consultant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Objectives: BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) is a standard radiological risk assessment for breast lesions, including six categories, of which category four is the widest range of likelihood cancer risk (2% to 95%). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of patient age and ACR breast density on the positive predictive value (PPV) of BI-RADS 4 subcategorization (4A, 4B, and 4C). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at King Fahed Hospital (KFH) between September 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022. PPV was calculated based on a histopathological report for all lesions. The correlation was made with patients' age groups ranging from < 45 years, 45-55 years, and > 55 years and four types of breast density on mammography. We used IBM-SPSS for data synthesis. The Chi-square test was used to assess any correlation between variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 44.62 ±14.32. Of the 248 cases, 81% were benign, 17% were malignant, and 2% were high-risk lesions. The age-related PPV of each BI-RADS category showed no significant differences among all age groups. However, the breast composition-related PPV cases with BI-RADS categories differed significantly within subcategory 4C (p-value<0.001). Conclusions: There were no positive relationships between increasing age and PPV in BI-RADS 4 subcategories 4A, B, and C. Breast composition-related PPV showed significant differences with BI-RADS 4C subcategories.

Indexed as

AgeBI-RADS category 4Breast cancerBreast compositionPositive predictive value

Identifiers

PMID39554642
PMCPMC11568739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.