Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554641›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2024

Comparison of efficacy of long follicular phase regimen and antagonist regimen on pregnancy outcome of fresh cycle or freeze-thawed cycle embryo transfer.

Pengtao Li, Jiawei Zhai, Ting Liu, Mengyuan Guo, Yuzhen Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pengtao LiPengtao Li, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Baoding Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Jiawei ZhaiJiawei Zhai, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Baoding Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Ting LiuTing Liu, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Baoding Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Mengyuan GuoMengyuan Guo, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Baoding Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.
Yuzhen WangYuzhen Wang, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Baoding Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcome of the fresh cycle or freeze-thaw cycle embryo transfer of patients treated with a long follicular phase regimen and antagonist regimen, and explore the clinical therapeutic effect of the two regimens. Methods: This was a retrospective study. The data of a total of 543 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) or frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in Baoding Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed in this study and were divided into four group to analyze the basic conditions, medication, laboratory indicators and clinical outcomes after embryo transfer of patients in each group. Results: The pregnancy rate and implantation rate in Groups A, B and C were higher than those in Group-D, and the differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: The antagonist regimen has a low dosage and short medication time and can achieve a high embryo utilization rate and blastula formation rate, saving time and cost for patients.

Indexed as

antagonist regimenfreeze-thawed cycle transferFresh cycle transferLong follicular phase regimen

Identifiers

PMID39554641
PMCPMC11568699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.