ArticleToxicology reports2024
Beyond smoking: Risk assessment of nicotine in pouches.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FDA authorisation of Zyn nicotine pouches: cross-sectional analysis of public discourse on X.Tobacco control · 2026Article
- Instagram Memes of Oral Nicotine Pouches: Content Analysis Study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026Article
- Acute Nicotine Poisoning From Nicotine Pouch Use in Adolescents: A Case Report of Two Pediatric Cases.Cureus · 2026Article
- Patterns and Perception of Nicotine Pouches Use Among Adults in Saudi Arabia.Tobacco use insights · 2026Article
- Awareness, Perceptions, and Use of Oral Nicotine Pouches Among Jazan University Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orally consumed nicotine pouches that contain no tobacco are marketed as a less harmful alternative to tobacco products. This study aims to assess nicotine in pouches and potential risks for health damage. 31 samples of nicotine pouches were collected and analyzed. The median nicotine uptake from single pouches was calculated to be 65 µg/kg bw. Consumption of more than one pouch per day would lead to a strikingly higher nicotine dose over the day. Health effects after nicotine exposure are, among others, cardiovascular effects. An acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.8 µg/kg bw was proposed for risk assessment purposes based on an observed increased heart rate in a human study after acute nicotine uptake. The ARfD was exceeded by at least 20-fold, even when considering the consumption of a single pouch with the lowest detected nicotine level. With higher nicotine contents in pouches or with an increasing number of pouches per day, vast ARfD exceedances are possible. Therefore, a clinically relevant elevation of heart rate is very likely to occur in consumers after acute consumption of nicotine pouches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.