ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
A RESPONSE to anti
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and severe asthma (SA) are 2 frequently coexisting conditions that are, in most cases, associated with eosinophilic inflammation. The concurrence of both diseases has a negative synergistic impact on disease severity and patients' health-related quality of life. Thus, a holistic, collaborative management of these patients is a critical unmet need. Mepolizumab, a systemic anti-IL-5 therapy, has been shown to be effective as an add-on treatment in both SA and CRSwNP, with more literature available on asthma outcomes than on CRSwNP. Objectives: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in improving the health-related quality of life of comorbid patients at 12 months using the SNOT-22 questionnaire. Secondary objectives include safety and efficacy outcomes of mepolizumab treatment in the 2 populations, which are expected to have variable severity of the respective comorbid conditions. Methods: RESPONSE is a European real-world prospective cohort study designed to assess the effectiveness of mepolizumab in 2 cohorts of adult patients: one with SA as primary diagnosis with (secondary diagnosis) comorbid CRSwNP, and another with CRSwNP as primary diagnosis with (secondary diagnosis) comorbid asthma. Up to 350 patients receiving newly prescribed mepolizumab will be followed up for 12 months as per the investigators' standard of care. Conclusion: This study will report the effects of anti-IL-5 therapy in both diseases investigated and the respective comorbidity, as well as the consequence of treating milder forms of asthma and CRSwNP with mepolizumab, supporting the emerging evidence on early treatment optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.