ReviewEnvironmental science & technology letters2024
Electrochemical CO
Review in Environmental science & technology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- CuSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Molecular engineering of metalloporphyrins and phthalocyanines for homogeneous and heterogeneous COChemical science · 2026Review
- Synergistic comparison of ANN and ANFIS predictive modeling with experimental electrochemical performance data in CO₂ conversion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Co-sputtered CuNi heteroatomic electrocatalyst for enhanced 5-hydroxymethylfurfural selective electrochemical conversion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Surface Behavior Regulation of Intermediates on the Copper-Based Catalysts for Enhancing Electrocatalytic COSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- Electrocatalytic Conversion of Renewable Electricity-What Molecules are More Promising as Energy Storage Media?Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- In Situ Raman Spectroscopy Reveals Structural Evolution and Key Intermediates on Cu-Based Catalysts for Electrochemical CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technoeconomic analysis (TEA) studies are vital for formulating guidelines that drive the commercialization of electrochemical CO
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.