ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Machine learning-based analysis identifies a 13-gene prognostic signature to improve the clinical outcomes of colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- VEGFC as a prognostic cytokine biomarker linking lymph node metastasis to immune suppression in breast cancer.European cytokine network · 2026Article
- The predictive value of serological markers for successful weaning and 30-day mortality in patients with severe intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- ColoLDB: a machine learning-based predictive model for colorectal cancer using routine laboratory parameters.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Commentary: Exploratory research on therapeutic agents combined with early diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Age-stratified analysis of therapeutic, immune, and glycosylation gene expression in colorectal cancer using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-apoptotic regulated cell death based prognostic risk model for colorectal cancer using machine learning guided two-step framework.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- The role of mitochondria-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis: construction of prognostic models based on machine learning.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Expanding the Horizons of ctHPVDNA Testing.Head and neck pathology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics integration and machine learning-driven construction of an immunogenic cell death prognostic model for colon cancer and functional validation of FCGR2A.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-driven mitochondrial gene signature for the diagnosis of breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common intestinal malignancy worldwide, posing a serious threat to public health. Due to its high heterogeneity, prognosis and drug response of different CRC patients vary widely, limiting the effectiveness of traditional treatment. Therefore, this study aims to construct a novel CRC prognostic signature using machine learning algorithms to assist in making informed clinical decisions and improving treatment outcomes. Methods: Gene expression matrix and clinical information of CRC patients were obtained from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Then, genes with prognostic value were identified through univariate Cox regression analysis. Next, nine machine learning algorithms, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), gradient boosting machine (GBM), CoxBoost, plsRcox, Ridge, Enet, StepCox, SuperPC and survivalSVM were integrated to form 97 combinations, which was employed to screen the best strategy for building a prognostic model based on the average C-index in the three CRC cohorts. Kaplan Meier survival analysis, receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and multivariate regression analysis were conducted to assess the predictive performance of the constructed signature. Furthermore, the CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms were utilized to quantify the infiltration level of immune cells. Besides, a nomogram were developed to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) probabilities for individual patient. Results: A prognostic signature consisting of 13 genes was developed utilizing LASSO Cox regression and GBM methods. Across both the training and validation datasets, the performance evaluation consistently indicated the signature's capacity to accurately predict the prognosis of CRC patients. Especially, compared with 30 published signatures, the 13-gene model exhibited dramatically superior predictive power. Even within clinical subgroups, it could still precisely stratify the prognosis. Functional analysis revealed a robust association between the signature and the immune status as well as chemotherapy response in CRC patients. Furthermore, a nomogram was created based on the signature-derived risk score, which demonstrated a strong predictive ability for OS in CRC patients. Conclusions: The 13-gene prognostic signature is expected to be a valuable tool for risk stratification, survival prediction, and treatment evaluation of patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.