Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39554578›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.

Xiaoyu Gu, Jian Rong, Li Zhu, Zhaoyan Dai, Shuai Ren, Jianxin Chen, Bo Yin, Zhongqiu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoyu Gu *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jian Rong *The Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology (Ministry of Education), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Li Zhu *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Zhaoyan DaiThe Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology (Ministry of Education), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Shuai RenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Jianxin ChenThe Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology (Ministry of Education), Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing, China.
Bo YinDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-8583
Zhongqiu WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-4302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS. Methods: Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram. Results: The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort. Conclusions: Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.

Indexed as

alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)computed tomography (CT)Gastric cancer (GC)hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID39554578
PMCPMC11565099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.