ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sintilimab Combined With Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel and SOX Regimen as Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer Achieving Complete Remission: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Prognostic model for patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- A Clinical Guidance for the Management of Patients With Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma and A Case Series.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative Mendelian Randomization and Pathomics Analysis Using Expression Quantitative Trait Loci and Genome-Wide Association Study Data Identifies Mismatch Repair Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.International journal of genomics · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of the S204 phosphorylation of the Smad3 protein in combination with Ki67 for the metastasis and prognosis of gastric cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Comparison of 2D and 3D measured iodine concentration of gastric adenocarcinoma on spectral-CT and their relationship with perineural invasion.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Multi-regional feature integration on enhanced CT for lymph node metastasis prediction in gastric cancer: a novel radiomics approach.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies found it difficult to differentiate hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA). We aimed to assess the efficacy of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram in identifying HAS. Methods: Portal phase CT images were collected from 59 patients with HAS and 122 patients with CGA. HAS and CGA were differentiated through univariate analysis of clinical characteristics, serum biochemical biomarkers, and CT features. The construction of the radiomics signature involved the application of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to establish the CT-based radiomics nomogram. Results: The separation of HAS patients from CGA patients relied on the serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and radiomics signature. The area under the curve (AUC) of AFP was 0.726 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.801] in the training cohort and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.541-0.800) in the test cohort, whereas the radiomic signature demonstrated a significantly higher AUC of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.895-0.980) in the training cohort and 0.868 (95% CI: 0.749-0.944) in the test cohort. The nomogram model yielded excellent accuracy for identifying HAS, achieving an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI: 0.923-0.992) in the training cohort and 0.905 (95% CI: 0.796-0.968) in the test cohort. Conclusions: Radiomics analysis offers promise for differentiating HAS from CGA, and the CT-based radiomics nomogram is likely to have significant clinical implications on HAS distinction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.